October 2007


There have been some pretty unusual stories in the press this week, related to city government and municipal elected officials. I can’t help but blog about a couple of these stories. Here is a quick recap:

Monday — New Delhi Deputy Mayor S.S. Bajwa was attacked by wild monkeys…which led him to fall from his balcony and die (I’m not making this up, thank Cameron for the email): India official dies after monkey attack

Tuesday — Ogden Mayor Matthew Godfrey tackled a burglar who tried to enter his home…the 135 lb mayor received national press for his act of bravery: Boston Globe article, Deseret News article

Wednesday — I didn’t believe this story when I first heard it on NPR, but apparently this is real. Dallas Deputy Mayor Dwaine Caraway is pushing a new policy…for residents to pull their pants up.

“The No. 1 mission is very simple: pulling up your pants. That’s all we want,” Caraway says. Read the NPR story (and even better listen to the rap song ‘Pull Your Pants Up’) here: Hip-Hop Plea

Thursday — After 9 mayors in 11 years in Eagle Mountain one city councilmember is pushing for background checks of all candidates running for office. I normally would be opposed to such a policy…but in the case of Eagle Mountain this might not be such a bad idea. Should Eagle Mountain’s mayoral candidates clear background checks 

Friday – ? seems like a boring news day compared to these stories…any suggestions?

According to a recent article by Forbes magazine the best city in America for a job is right here in Salt Lake City. Forbes utilized five data points to create their city ranking: unemployment rate, job growth, income growth, median household income and cost of living for full-year 2006. Forbes then measured the largest 100 metropolitan areas. Salt Lake City’s ranking was strengthened by a low unemployment rating and a high income growth ranking. salt-lake-city.jpg

Forbes writes, “Topping the latest ranking of out Best Cities for Jobs list is Salt Lake City. The Crossroads to the West, an economy that has been predominantly driven by the mining and steel industries, has developed into a service-based city and has become a tech sector hub for digerati migrating from Silicon Valley.”

 

Best Cities for Employment
1. Salt Lake City
2. Raleigh, NC
3. Phoenix, AZ
4. Jacksonville, FL
5. Orlando, FL

You can read the full article here: Best Cities for Jobs       Interestingly there are also articles in the paper today about Proctor and Gamble building a manufacturing plant in Box Elder Co. and Ogden city is noted as one of two finalists for the relocation of the U.S. Olympic Cycling Agency.

An interesting op-ed piece in the Boston Globe recently addressed the role of property tax as a revenue source for local government and schools. The authors of this piece argue that property tax is hated because it is visible (which I think we can all agree with), but they contend that this visibility is really the strength of the tax…and why we should not change it. The authors make the same point we have made for years, none of the other taxes we pay are as transparent as property taxes. But they continue in arguing that the transparency of property taxes enables a more democratic system (unlike many of the other taxes). According to the authors:

No one likes paying taxes, but as long as we value the New England tradition of local control over public services, we should appreciate the inherent strengths of our system. With the property tax, the citizenry has its hands on the steering wheel.

You can read the full op-ed here: The Strengths of the Property Tax

There have been a number of questions about the tax changes made during the 2007 Legislative session and how they will impact Utah cities and towns. In particular, there have been questions about what action cities may have to take in response to legislative actions.

It should be noted that virtually all of the tax changes were part of the comprehensive tax bill which incorporates virtually every tax change made during the session. This bill was Second Substitute Senate Bill 223 sponsored by Sen. Niederhauser. The bill incorporated not only all of the sales tax related changes but also the income tax reform. It also included a number of special business tax changes.

The following information outlines the primary changes that affect our cities. Obviously all cities are not impacted by every tax change. However, there was enough of an overlap that we chose to outline all of the tax changes here in this information.

The Removal of Food from the Specialty Taxes
Non-prepared food was exempted from the sales tax base for the specialty tax levies (previously referred to as the “boutique taxes”). In some instances there have been attempts at offsetting revenue increases. All sales tax changes take effect on January 1, 2008. Be aware that the actual impact of the food removal will vary from community to community and will depend entirely on what portion food sales represent of your community’s tax base.

Municipal Local Option Tax (1%)
This municipal local option tax was not affected by the partial removal of sales tax from unprepaired food items. There will be no revenue implications associated with this revenue source.

Municipal Transportation Tax Levies and Transit Levies
There are a number of specialized transportation levies that were impacted by the removal of food. To offset the impact of the food removal the tax rates were raised on the remaining tax base. The cities are required to amend their ordinances on this matter.  If you wish to recapture the money that was associated with sales tax on food, you are allowed to raise the municipal transporation levy from .25% to .30%.  This must be done prior to November to ensure that the new rate is reflected in January when the rate changes take effect.  If you have questions on the oridnance, we have attached a sample ordinance for you to review.  Also, please feel free to call or write with additional questions.

Resort Community Tax
The legislation authorized an increase in the base resort community tax rate cap from 1% to 1.1% to minimize the impact of removing food. Since this action involves an increase in a rate cap, cities will have to pass a new ordinance to implement the new rate cap. Be aware that although the law change itself does not take effect until Jan. 2008, current law requires a 90 day notification to the tax commission prior to implementation. As such, impacted cities should not delay making decisions and necessary ordinance change. Lastly, there was no offsetting rate increase on the additional .5% resort tax dedicated for debt reduction.

Generally speaking, the offsets that were provided in the legislation cover any anticipated losses that would be associated with a reduction in the tax base. While this is predicated on the composition of the tax base for each affected community, it is fair to say that most cities and towns will see little or no negative impact related to the removal of sales tax on food, and in many circumstances the net result will be revenue positive.

Hopefully this information helps.  Please call myself or Lincoln with any additional questions or concerns.

property-taxes-in-utah.JPG

Property taxes have now caught up with increasing home values not only across the nation, but even here in Utah. According to New Jersey assemblyman, John McKeon property tax issues are “issues No. 1, 2, and 3″ for his residents. New Jersey isn’t unique, at least 21 states are currently working on property tax cuts or shifts for the upcoming or current session. And apparently the same sentiment is brewing here. Last I checked there were 6 bill files here in Utah opened to do the same thing.

However, fortunately Utahns are in a pretty good place with comparably low property tax burdens. According, to a recent Utah Foundation study property tax is the least burdensome tax or fee Utahns pay — Utah’s property tax burden ranks 37th (Utah Foundation State and Local Tax Burden). According to a recent article by Money magazine Utah’s property tax burden (for a family of three making $100,000) is around $1,400 below the national average. Tax-friendly places 2007

Last week the Deseret News editorial board articulated a great article opposing shortsighted property tax caps or reforms. You can read the full editorial here: Utah’s Property Tax System Isn’t Broke. Here is an excerpt…

“Before state lawmakers begin tinkering with the way counties levy and assess property taxes, they need to take a deep breath, then wait for the urge to disappear…the truth is, Utah already has a strict and fair system of keeping a lid on property tax rates. If anything, a few counties need to tweak the way they assess properties, nothing more.”

I couldn’t agree more.

Hopefully, before we move toward restricting property tax even more we carefully evaluate the potential effects of shifting revenue dependency. The reality is property tax caps usually result in increases for other taxes or fees–taxes and fees which in Utah are already relatively high.

Next Page »